Kramer

A developer from Germany continues (allegedly) doing what he's famous for: getting into trouble

 

Where Will All the Doggies Go?

Canines and humans loved South Pointe Park, but for 18 months this giant expanse of land and shore will be forbidden territory for dogs and most people.

 

Hours and Hours of Talk

After more than nine hours of debate and discussion the only decision made about Miami 21 was to not make a decision.

 

News

 

Miami-Dade

A skeptical audience hears FDOT's plan for express lanes

 

Miami Beach

A potential Beach mayoral candidate finds a way to get (negative) attention. Also: The Certain Appearances Prohibited Ordinance does not apply to the housing authority, and CANDO edges closer to reality.

 

Sunny Isles Beach

The conflict between the city and the giant grocery store chain continues.

 

Coral Gables

A few more employees over at the City Beautiful will now have to share how they make their extra cash.

 

Please report problems, such as broken links, to angie@miamisunpost.com


Click here to find out how to win breakfast for your office!


 

 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Feature  

Kramer Versus Kramer

Thomas Kramer, Developer Who Claims Credit for Creating SoBe’s ‘SoFi’ District, Continues To Attract Plenty of Trouble

By Kirk Nielsen

Developer Thomas Kramer loves the bad-boy image. File photo by Mitchell Zachs/Magicalphotos.com

Thomas Kramer, South Beach’s most notorious high-rise developer and 50-year-old bad boy, has again eluded criminal charges that could have landed him in prison.

Three months ago, gossip columnists from the New York Post to the Miami Herald broke word of Kramer’s arrest after a late-night incident on March 31 in the Rainbow Room at the top of New York City’s Rockefeller Center. Police detained him at about 11:30 p.m., charged him with three misdemeanors — endangering the welfare of a child, abusive sexual contact, and forcible touching of a minor — and threw him in jail. According to police, a 13-year-old boy accused Kramer of clasping the boy’s genitals in a Rainbow Room lavatory that night. Both were attending a birthday bash for Jeffrey Steiner, CEO of Fairchild Corp., a leading manufacturer of nuts, bolts, latches and other fastening devices used in the aerospace industry.

Not surprisingly, accounts of what happened vary wildly. On May 11, during a recent interview at his Star Island compound, Kramer said he was standing at a urinal peeing when the boy bumped into him. So he pushed the kid back. He denies he touched the boy’s private parts. “But you know what? There was never a police statement filed. And there was no process. And the charges got dropped,” Kramer claimed during the interview.

Contrary to Kramer’s assurances, however, the charges had not been dropped. In reality, he was facing a June 29 court date in New York State Court in Manhattan. All three misdemeanor charges were still pending. “The case is being investigated,” Jennifer Kushner, a spokeswoman at the Manhattan District Attorney’s Office, said in late May. “It is up to the judge ultimately to determine if charges are dropped.” In May, Kramer did not respond to a request for comment on the discrepancy between his account and that of the Manhattan District Attorney’s Office.

Moreover, again in stark contrast to Kramer’s version of events, NYPD officers had indeed filed a statement about the incident. Kramer’s Miami-based lawyer Richard Sharpstein said he even read it. “It was three lines,” Sharpstein said last week, though he couldn’t recall whether the report employed the word “crotch,” “groin” or “genitals” in describing the boy’s allegation.

While all this looks bad in the court of public opinion, in Manhattan criminal court last Friday, June 29, Assistant District Attorney Lais Washington asked the judge to scuttle the charges. “The assistant [district attorney] said the People [of New York] moved to dismiss the case because it couldn’t be proven beyond a reasonable doubt,” Kushner said. Kramer, who appeared in court with Jesse Berman, a Manhattan-based criminal defense attorney, did not respond to a request for comment. “Mr. Kramer is thrilled, overwhelmed” about the dismissal, Sharpstein said. “He’s the victim here.”

The victim’s reputation for failing to respect boundaries — be they personal or architectural — dates to the early ’90s, when Kramer relocated from New York City (where he worked as a stock trader) to Miami Beach. Inspired by the construction of Battery Park in Manhattan, he fixated on the blighted southern tip of Miami Beach. He bought $30 million of property south of Fifth Street; his plan was to turn it into the semblance of a quaint Italian port village, only with skyscrapers instead of mountains. After a long court battle in Miami-Dade, Kramer won the right to built Portofino Tower, a salmon-pink, 44-story, and by many accounts ugly, luxury condo high-rise. He later sold several parcels to other high-rise developers, most particularly The Related Group, making a hefty profit.

But Kramer has been unable to escape the specter of a lawsuit filed in 1991 by his then-father-in law Sigfried Otto to reclaim $145 million from Kramer. In April a state circuit court judge ruled that Kramer owes Otto’s daughters $108 million. Otto, who died in 1996, maintained the money was a loan; Kramer says it was a gift. He is appealing the ruling.

Kramer has enjoyed great success, however, fending off accusations of lechery. He’s now beat at least five such allegations in the past 15 years. On Halloween night 1992, a model told Miami Beach cops that Kramer squeezed her breasts at his short-lived South Beach nightclub Hell, but then she filed no charges. In 1995, Swiss judges dismissed charges that he jumped a woman in a Zurich nightclub bathroom. In 1999, a Miami-Dade judge dismissed a battery charge filed by a man after a fight in a South Beach restaurant, and London police charged him with raping his secretary, who ended up not testifying, thus ending the case.

With the dismissal of the Rainbow Room incident, Kramer can focus his energies on another allegation involving someone else’s body. Abigail Brzezinski, a-29-year-old ultrasound technician who lives in Broward County, is suing him for grabbing and exposing one of her breasts on Halloween night last year. The alleged incident occurred at Quattro Restaurant on Lincoln Road while the two posed for a photo. Brzezinski was reportedly dressed as Tinker Bell.

Kramer denies he touched Brzezinski’s breast and accuses her and her Boca Raton-based lawyer Brian Glick of “blackmail.” Kramer’s attorney Sharpstein calls it “clear, unadulterated extortion” and says Glick asked him for a $450,000 settlement. Glick refused to disclose how much he demanded before moving ahead with the lawsuit in April in Miami-Dade civil court. He denies he is engaging in blackmail; he says he was giving Kramer an “opportunity” to be “straight up” with his client, whom he described as “a nice girl.”        

Kramer told this reporter in May that he intended to fight the Brzezinksi allegation if it’s the last thing he does. But so far he has rebuffed Glick’s attempts to deliver a subpoena, preventing discovery in the case from beginning.

Comments? E-mail letters@miamisunpost.com.

 

Letters

Oh boy, do we have letters

 

Murmurs

Lincoln Road is taken over by by iPhone zombies while the city of Miami Beach unveils a hip new song.

 

Groundwork

The rich, rich world of South Florida real estate as seen through the eyes of columnist Helen Hill

 

Film

Transformers is a great movie? Well, that's what Dan Hudak says.

 

Bound

According to a book, Florida's drought will soon swallow us whole.

 

Art Review

Embrace the banality of it all at FIU's Cintas Foundation Exhibition.

 

Calendar

Chow

Fast Bites

Restaurant Listings

Music Review

 

Film Capsules

Musical Archive

 

Wakefield Archive

- Category305

 

Special Sections 2006

 

The SunPost 50 2007