|
RERUNS: THE MMTP ARCHIVE
Episode 23: Will
the Real John McCain Please Stand Up?
By Lee Molloy
 |
|
John McCain |
For our
reality series Make Me the President, we scoured the country to
find the most power-hungry, Machiavellian and downright
unattractive people in the United States of America (“The Greatest
Nation On Earth” ™) to find the person who could raise the most
money, be willing to break the most promises and offer the most
bland reason to become — The President.
This week on
MMTP:
Sen. Hillary
“Nottie” Clinton finally gave her blessing to Sen. Barack “Hottie”
Obama and advised her fans to support Obama’s bid to win MMTP
’08.
Meanwhile,
Sen. John “Maverick?” McCain tried to woo Clinton’s fans over to
the dark side of the force: “As the
father of three daughters, I owe her a debt for inspiring millions
of women to believe there is no opportunity in this great country
beyond their reach,” he said in
Louisiana last week. “I am proud to call her my friend.” So, then
why, when one of his fans asked him on the campaign trail, “How do
we beat the bitch?” did he not tell the questioner that one
doesn’t talk about his friends that way, instead of saying,
“That’s an excellent question”?
In a blatant attempt to attract the kids, McCain gave his weird
speech against a green backdrop. And his parody of Obama with the
self-satisfied “and that’s not change we can believe in” zinger
really amused the white folks in the audience, which was,
effectively, everyone in the audience.
The thing about McCain is he sounds a lot better if one is not
distracted by the visuals of a tired old man with wooden delivery
and an incredibly insincere smile. Seriously, he does; just don’t
look at the screen. As they say in show business, “He has a great
face for radio.”
Anyway, a recently released CNN/Opinion Research Corp. poll found
that if Obama does not choose
Clinton for his veep, 22 percent of her fans would stay home
during the general election and another 17 percent would vote for
McCain.
So,
considering
Clinton
has come out firmly on the side of Obama, and both the Team
Democrats contestants agree there is hardly any difference between
them, why would a fan switch allegiance to a Team Republicans
contestant? Is McCain really a maverick that Team Democrats fans
could accept? Let’s take a look:
“I will keep fighting to give the government back to the people;
to keep our promises to young and old alike by paying our debts,
saving Social Security and Medicare and reforming a tax code that
benefits the powerful few at the expense of the many,” McCain said
at the suspension of his MMTP 2000 campaign. Which is a
noble sentiment to be sure, and one that he reiterated during a
Senate floor speech regarding the Bush tax cuts on May 26, 2001: “I
cannot in good conscience support a tax cut in which so many of
the benefits go to the most fortunate among us, at the expense of
middle-class Americans who most need tax relief.” But, as MMTP
has said before, McCain 2000 is not McCain 2008, which is apparent
in a recent radio campaign ad claiming, “I’ll make the Bush tax
cuts permanent.” And that, like in the days before he discovered
Viagra, makes him a little bit flip-floppy.
Speaking of flip-flopping, in 2003 McCain said that ethanol “does
nothing to reduce fuel consumption, nothing to increase our energy
independence, nothing to improve air quality.” Then, while
campaigning in
Iowa in August 2006, he described ethanol as a “vital alternative
energy source, not only because of our dependency on foreign oil,
but its greenhouse reduction effects.” Then, on the trail in
February in
Massachusetts,
he reverted to his anti-ethanol position. So, to totally
disrespect the words of Bob Dylan, McCain’s answers, my friends,
are blowing in the wind, his answers are blowing in the wind….
Because many
of the
Clinton
fans who speak of supporting McCain are women, MMTP
producers decided to look at McCain’s opinions on women’s
reproductive health.
“I’d love to see a point where Roe v. Wade is irrelevant and could
be repealed because abortion is no longer necessary,” McCain told
the media in 1999. “But certainly in the short term, or even the
long term, I would not support repeal of Roe v. Wade, which would
then force women in
America to [have] illegal and dangerous operations.” OK, that
seems a reasonable position for a conservative to take, but again,
that was then; this is now, and now JohnMcCain.com clearly reads:
“John McCain believes Roe v. Wade is a flawed decision that must
be overturned, and as president, he will nominate judges who
understand that courts should not be in the business of
legislating from the bench.”
In March
2007, the New York Times
reported the following conversation in
Iowa:
Reporter: “What about grants for sex education in the
United States? Should they include instructions about using
contraceptives? Or should it be Bush’s policy, which is just
abstinence?”
Long pause.
McCain: “Ahhh. I think I support the president’s policy.”
Abstinence? So, kids raging with hormones should practice
abstinence and not be told about safe sex. Is he kidding? And,
furthermore, this comes from the man who can’t keep it in his own
pants, as evidenced by the fact that he had previously admitted to
cheating on his first wife. What a bunch of BS!
Now, we all
know that McCain isn’t that smart a guy — he graduated 894 out of
899 students from the
Naval
Academy
at Annapolis, which is the bottom 1 percent of the class for
heaven’s sake. Then he told the Wall
Street Journal on
Nov. 26, 2005, “I'm going to be honest: I know a lot less about
economics than I do about military and foreign policy issues. I
still need to be educated.” Therefore, especially in this terrible
economic climate, would Clinton fans really prefer another
intellectually subpar person in the White House over a
Harvard-educated college lecturer? Somehow we doubt it.
Having been
through a war and served his country with heroism and honor,
McCain’s patriotism is above reproach. He reached the rank of
captain in the Navy and served as the naval liaison to the U.S.
Senate, so, there is no doubt he knows about the military and has
the best interests of its men and women at heart. This is why
during the Somalia conflict he said on the Senate floor on Oct.
14, 1993, “For us to get into nation-building, law and order,
etc., I think, is a tragic and terrible mistake.”
Then why
does he now see things so differently with Iraq and support the
president’s policy of nation-building? Has he changed his mind on
the role of the military, or has his macho posturing to “never
surrender” really clouded his judgment so badly? Whichever it is,
it is difficult to believe that fans of Clinton will defect to
this man.
Tune in next
week to see if
Clinton
fans are willing to stand next to Obama fans and stop McCain fans
from getting their boy the executive office aboard Air Force One.
Hail to the
Chief! |